![]() To keep tabs on your activity and health, the Vivosmart 5 features an optical heart rate monitor, an accelerometer, an ambient light sensor, and a blood oxygen saturation (SpO2) monitor. The Unite has a less impressive 3ATM rating, which means it's water resistant up to 98 feet. You can safely wear it in the rain or snow as well as when you shower, swim, dive, or snorkel, but it's not suitable for scuba diving or high-speed water sports. ![]() ![]() Like the Charge 5, the Vivosmart 5 has a 5ATM water-resistance rating, which means it can withstand pressure equivalent to a depth of 164 feet. The Unite promises up to four days on a charge, but also lasted just three in my experience. The Charge 5 also promises to run for up to a week on a charge, but lasted only three days with the always-on display setting activated in testing. It fell short of the promised maximum of seven days in testing, but still lasted six days with the screen brightness set to Auto and five days on the highest brightness level. The Polar Unite also has a color touch screen, but no always-on option.īattery life is one area where the Vivosmart 5 shines. To wake the display, you simply rotate and lift your wrist toward your body in testing, this gesture worked most of the time, but I occasionally had to use alternate methods: pressing the physical button or tapping the screen twice.įor comparison, the Fitbit Charge 5 features a colorful AMOLED touch screen with an always-on option, a more durable Corning Gorilla Glass layer to protect the display, and a classier aluminum case. There's no always-on option, but you can set the length of time before the display turns off (short, medium, or long) via the Settings menu. Even on a medium brightness setting, the screen is clear and easy to read indoors and outside. The screen offers seven brightness levels, but note that the top three settings reduce battery life to adjust the brightness, navigate to Settings > System > Brightness on the device. Weighing just 0.9 ounce, the Vivosmart 5 is comfortable for 24/7 wear and so lightweight that I barely notice it's on. It has one physical multifunction button that sits beneath the display. The tracker component measures about 0.4 inch in depth and features a 0.73-by-0.41-inch (LW), black-and-white OLED touch screen with a resolution of 154 by 88 pixels. For this review, Garmin sent me the small/medium model in white. You can get the small/medium version in black, white, or mint, but the large model is only available in black. It comes in two sizes: small/medium (for wrists between 4.8 and 7.4 inches in circumference) and large (for wrists between 5.8 and 9 inches). Compared with other brands, the Vivosmart 5 mostly competes against the aforementioned Fitbit Charge 5 and the $149.95 Polar Unite.Īesthetically, the Vivosmart 5 looks pretty standard for a sports-focused fitness tracker, with a polycarbonate case, an acrylic lens, and a silicone strap. The latter model features an accelerometer to track your steps and sleep, but no heart rate monitor. The Vivosmart 5 sits above the $79.99 Vivofit 4, Garmin's most basic fitness tracker, in the lineup. Garmin makes a lot of different wearables, so it can be confusing to differentiate between them. It's a suitable option for newcomers to fitness tracking, but trails our Editors' Choice winner in this category, the Fitbit Charge 5, which has a superior color touch screen, built-in GPS, and contactless payment support for the same price. It monitors all the basics 24/7, including your activity, calories burned, heart rate, steps, and sleep, plus a few more advanced health metrics like your blood oxygen saturation (SpO2), energy reserves, respiration rate, and stress level. If you're looking for a simple, easy-to-use fitness tracker, the $149.99 Garmin Vivosmart 5 might suit your needs. But not everyone cares about advanced features and fashion-forward designs. Best Hosted Endpoint Protection and Security Softwareįrom the Venu 2 GPS smartwatch to the fashion-forward Lily, Garmin makes some of the best and most beautiful wearables on the market.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |